Repository logo
 

Group-level social influences for carnivore restoration and management

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Mireille N., author
dc.contributor.authorNiemiec, Rebecca, advisor
dc.contributor.authorCrooks, Kevin, committee member
dc.contributor.authorTeel, Tara, committee member
dc.contributor.authorQuartuch, Mike, committee member
dc.contributor.authorJacobson, Cynthia, committee member
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-28T10:29:04Z
dc.date.available2024-08-28T10:27:54Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractIn this dissertation, I conducted research on how perceptions of the group level of the social system influence individuals' perspectives and behaviors related to carnivore restoration and management (CRM) in the U.S. American West. Using the case study of gray wolf (Canis lupus) reintroduction in Colorado, I explored three aspects of the group level of the social system. After nearly 80 years since their extirpation, environmental organizations advocating for wolf recovery introduced a ballot initiative (Proposition 114) that mandates Colorado Parks and Wildlife, the state wildlife agency, reintroduce wolves into Colorado by December 31st, 2023. In November 2020 Proposition 114 passed with about 51% of the votes (Colorado Election Results, 2020), marking the first ever U.S. reintroduction of an endangered species via a ballot initiative. In my first chapter, I used public survey data to explore how intragroup perceptions, or how perceptions of a group one identifies as belonging to, influenced individual and collective civic actions related to wolf reintroduction. I found that social norms influenced intended voting for Proposition 114 and plans for those individuals that opposed reintroduction to engage in collective action against reintroduction. In my second chapter, I used stakeholder interview data to examine perspectives of what would make a stakeholder engagement process, that brings together conflicting stakeholders to collaboratively build recommendations for wolf restoration and management, successful. Stakeholders expected that the process should be representative, transparent, and actively inclusive and that it should foster two-way dialogue. Additionally, to be considered successful, they believed it should achieve the social outcomes of conflict reduction, social learning, increased trust in agency, and increased support for the management plan. Lastly, in my third chapter, I used stakeholder interview data to examine how perspectives of the outgroup, or a group one does not identify as belonging to, influence social conflict about wolf reintroduction. I found that conflict was fueled by perceptions that the outgroup is unjust, misinformed, homogenous, and unmalleable. Overall, my dissertation expands our collective understanding of the multi-scalar influencers to human behavior that affect carnivore restoration and management. Based on these findings, I recommend how to develop interventions and stakeholder engagement that can help achieve desired social outcomes related to CRM objectives.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediumdoctoral dissertations
dc.identifierGonzalez_colostate_0053A_17938.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/236953
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2020-
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.rights.accessEmbargo expires: 08/28/2024.
dc.subjectqualitative methodology
dc.subjectstakeholder engagement
dc.subjectconflict reconciliation
dc.subjectwolf restoration
dc.subjectsocial norms
dc.titleGroup-level social influences for carnivore restoration and management
dc.typeText
dcterms.embargo.expires2024-08-28
dcterms.embargo.terms2024-08-28
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineHuman Dimensions of Natural Resources
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Gonzalez_colostate_0053A_17938.pdf
Size:
1019.02 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

2020-
Theses and Dissertations